[Josh Bowers]

I will make a request at the development team to check for Nexus 6.

Thanks, I appreciate it.

I recommend to check your software with a different phone in the meantime.

I don't believe it's the phone. For one, if that were the case, NXP TagInfo should not be able to recognize the tag type, but it does, as shown in the screenshot I posted earlier. Also, I checked using the getTechList method in Android's Tag class:

private void cardLogic(final Intent intent) {



    Tag tag = intent.getParcelableExtra(NfcAdapter.EXTRA_TAG);

    

    Log.d(TAG, "Tech list: " + Arrays.toString(tag.getTechList()));

}

Which provided the following list:

D/MainActivity: Tech list: [android.nfc.tech.NfcA, android.nfc.tech.MifareUltralight, android.nfc.tech.Ndef]

---

+ 0  |  - 0

[Josh Bowers]

Thank you for looking into the problem.

The class member variable m_cardType is NOT updated in the method cardLogic(). The card type name is properly returned if variable "cardType" is used.

You mean the variable name is the problem? I don't see how the variable name is relevant. Here I changed it from "m_cardType" to "cardType":

private void cardLogic(final Intent intent) throws IOException, FormatException {



    Log.d(TAG, "TapLinx version: " + m_libInstance.getTaplinxVersion());

    Log.d(TAG, "Android version: " + Build.VERSION.RELEASE);

    Log.d(TAG, "Phone model: " + Build.MODEL);



    CardType cardType = m_libInstance.getCardType(intent);



    Log.d(TAG, "Card type: " + cardType.getTagName());

}

Which produced the following log output:

D/MainActivity: TapLinx version: 1.4

D/MainActivity: Android version: 7.1.1

D/MainActivity: Phone model: Nexus 6

D/SDK: UID:0x044DB09AC24C80

D/SDK: This is NXP Card 3

D/MainActivity: Card type: Unknown Card

Please let me know if I misunderstood.

---

+ 0  |  - 0

[Josh Bowers]

For reference, I am attaching the output of NXP TagInfo when I scan this tag. It indicates that the type is MifareUltralight, no appendix.

I tried testing for all the Ultralight types:

private void cardLogic(final Intent intent) throws IOException, FormatException {



    Log.d(TAG, "TapLinx version: " + m_libInstance.getTaplinxVersion());

    Log.d(TAG, "Android version: " + Build.VERSION.RELEASE);

    Log.d(TAG, "Phone model: " + Build.MODEL);



    CardType m_cardType = m_libInstance.getCardType(intent);



    if(CardType.Ultralight == m_cardType){

        Log.d(TAG, "Ultralight");

    } else if(CardType.UltralightC == m_cardType) {

        Log.d(TAG, "UltralightC");

    } else if(CardType.UltralightEV1_11 == m_cardType) {

        Log.d(TAG, "UltralightEV1_11");

    } else if(CardType.UltralightEV1_21 == m_cardType) {

        Log.d(TAG, "UltralightEV1_21");

    } else if(CardType.UltralightNano_40 == m_cardType) {

        Log.d(TAG, "UltralightNano_40");

    } else if(CardType.UltralightNano_48 == m_cardType) {

        Log.d(TAG, "UltralightNano_48");

    } else {

        Log.d(TAG, "Unknown type");

    }

}

Which produced the following log output:

D/MainActivity: TapLinx version: 1.4

D/MainActivity: Android version: 7.1.1

D/MainActivity: Phone model: Nexus 6

D/SDK: UID:0x044DB09AC24C80

D/SDK: This is NXP Card 3

D/MainActivity: Unknown type

Simply logging the card type alone also indicates an unknown type:

CardType m_cardType = m_libInstance.getCardType(intent);



Log.d(TAG, "Card type: " + m_cardType);

Log output:

D/MainActivity: Card type: UnknownCard

---

+ 0  |  - 0

[Josh Bowers]

Thank you for your response.

The TapLinx version is declared as follows, correct?

dependencies {

    compile fileTree(dir: 'libs', include: ['*.jar'])

    androidTestCompile('com.android.support.test.espresso:espresso-core:2.2.2', {

        exclude group: 'com.android.support', module: 'support-annotations'

    })

    compile 'com.android.support:appcompat-v7:25.3.1'

    testCompile 'junit:junit:4.12'

    compile('taplinx-android:nxpnfcandroidlib:1.4@aar') { transitive = true } 

}

If so, I had already set the version to 1.4, but the tag is still not being identified correctly.

I have tried rebuilding the project; no change.

Please advise.

---

+ 1  |  - 0

[Author]

Posts